vladx

Salut Da poti folosi licenta de v10 ca upgrade pt 2008, iar corespondenta e urmatoarea: BD Antivirus 10 -> BD Antivirus 2008 BD Antivirus Plus & BD Internet Security v10 -> BD Internet Security 2008 Singurul pt care nu poti upgrada este Total Security care este un produs nou.

Ok i made the test and the answer is no, BitDefender can't detect malware protected with Themida.

ESET face un antivirus bun, insa ratele lor de detectie n-au fost niciodata exceptionale (euristica e intr-adevar buna). Alwil si Grisoft... probabil nu "impotmolesc" calculatorul, insa nici nu prind mare lucru. De acord in legatura cu Eset dar cat despre ceilalti eu zic ca sunt destul de buni, in special AVG care a…

Hello If it expired you can just contact the Live Assistance and ask for a new one.

Sorry I am small business/home user with the same question - 32-bit or 64 bit? I've tried the "Control Panel->System(Classic View) and at System Type ...." suggestion from vladx but I don't see a "system type option" on my screen. I have 2 PCs. My 3 year old desktop is a Packard Bell with an Intel Celeron 2.6gHz processor…

Go to Control Panel->System(Classic View) and at System Type you should see what version you have.

Ei bine se pare ca am avut dreptate, odata cu Beta 3 BTS 2008 are si self-protection.Singurul proces care se pare ca poate fi oprit este bdagent.exe

Poate da timpul inainte fara probleme, am facut eu teste.

Well assuming a smart rootkit is in your computer and plants malware that uses these leaks, then antileak protection would be needed in this case.

Hi PawBear You shouldn't be believe everything in magazines reviews, mostly aren't too reliable but the one from matousec it is.All depends if you consider leaktests important, personally i don't.If they could add antileak protection it would be nice, but there are other things more important to add or improve.

Of course if a pro hacker wants to attack you personally then no firewall can't stop him. But unless you work for a important company and have very important files in your computer, you don't have to worry.Most of the attacks are random and BD Firewall would protect you well.

With pleasure.

Hello duntowin Yes you nmeed to download the trial by going here and choosing the lang you want or if the computers are connected on a LAN you could send the trial to the 2nd pc or copyiing the trial to a cd or flash.After that install it and just use the same key to register.

Well as a FW i would choose Comodo Firewall wich is free, but if you want one simpler to use and very good protection choose Online Armor.

Disable the Virus Shield(open the Bitdefender window: Antivirus->Shield and uncheck Real-time protection is enabled) and delete that instasller like Niels said.If you can't delete it, download Killbox from here and use it.

Salut Ca sa te asiguri ca nu ai nimic incearca niste scanari online:(iti trebuie IE) -BitDefender Free Online Virus Scan : http://www.bitdefender.com/scan8/ie.html -Kaspersky Online Scanner: http://www.kaspersky.com/virusscanner -Ewido Online Scan : http://www.ewido.net/en/onlinescan/ Daca nici asa nimic nu este gasit si…

I'm sure you're not a beginner, but you have to calm down and wait...insisting on a thing won't remove the detections quicker.

The whole point of this thread is that virus definitions: Trojan.Crack.Stylexp.B Trojan.Activcrk.A DO NOT EXIST. Only one other website that has a security product that I have never heard of also has these virus definitions. Obviously, they are flaud, as we saw that my files are not infected. Therefore, I recommend the…

[f both Kasperky and AntiVir (www.free-av.com - Best free virus scanner from the Germans) do not see it as a virus, it's not a virus Even if KA,Antivir,Nod32,Norton etc. wouldn't see it as malware, it could still be possible that the file is malware.There can be even malwares detected by no AV. P.S. I'm not speaking here…

Well, i saw few times when Bitdefender detects cracks wich aren't infected, IME Kaspersky detects much more cracks,keygens than BD, naming them not a virus.... However, most of the times, these kind of programs contain malware. You shouls be carrefull with them. Yea, and i can confirm this.

...and one is 1.1GB. Is this file in fact an archive?If yes, than it's ossible that the archive contains more files and only one is reported as infected.

No, the user can't remove those signatures manually the only thing you could do is to exclude the folder/folders whre these files are located from scanning until the people from BD will remove the detection if they are really FPs.

Hi Eric You also posted this in the Feature request area wich is more appropriate so i'll close this one.

Just open the log, copy the contents from it and paste them here. Edit: Topic moved to a more appropriate forum.

Sorry, but I am not sure how to do that. The scan log is stored in C:\ProgramData\BitDefender\Desktop\Profiles\Logs, in the folder of the scan type you ran,open it and copy the contents here.

Like Andrei said, Bitdefender scans them thru the http scanner and if it has signatures for the threat it will warn you.

Hi Cris If you reffer to exploits, i think the http scanner can block them.

Hi makkie You still need a separate antispywaretool. Because the antispywarepart of BitDefender will detect some malware but not everything. The best antispyware now is superantispyware which can remove difficult malware. Regards Niels Yes Niels, SuperAntispyware is probably better than Spysweeper now, but if he payed…

Hello moondanc I understand you wouldn't upgrade to Win98SE only to use Bitdefender, but Win98 SE it's a really a deserved upgrade as it brings many improvements, including some fixed bugs.

Hi Marc Well, if you payed for it already keep it it as on-demand, but if you haven't you could choose the SuperAntispyware or AVG Antispyware free versions wich are better IMHO than Spysweeper.