Comments
-
23 hours ago, daman1 said: Would you believe them if they tell you no? would that be good enough for you? I highly doubt it there is a room of techs sitting there checking in on ALL of BD subscribers traffic. You're absolutely right! which is corroborated by the fact BD staff hardly post on here and the numerous posts…
-
3 hours ago, tuklug32 said: For BD to scan the SSL traffic, it needs to MITM the traffic (that's what i think it does atleast) Browser <---> Bitdefender <---> website So the the browser is connecting to bitdefender with ssl, thats why the browser says it's BD. But it's good, because bitdefender is probably faster at…
-
I also ran an experiment. I disabled SSL scanning in Bit defender AV 2017, then went to https://protonmail.com It provided me with SHA-1 certificate fingerprint 0C:13:D9:0D:85:8A:B7:8D:14:5E:9C:59:5B:FE:2D:2E:3D:67:86:51. The CA is Que Vadis. I then went to Steve Gibson's fingerprint website…
-
On 23/02/2017 at 9:25 AM, Sorin G. said: Hello, That is a lot of tinfoil theory, however the simplest reason the product installs the certificate is to ensure the websites are what they pretend to be and prevent any attacks. If you are worried you can always disable that feature. You sure about it being "tinfoil theory"?…
