Hello: I'm trying to familiarize myself with BIS 2016 and noticed an obvious difference between number of vulnerabilities in the Security Report versus those found in the Vulnerability scanner. The scanner also says it found several (!) but only fixed one. What were the others? How come the # in Security Report doesn't match what was in the scanner report? Usually one can blow off findings like this; unfortunately, with my experiences, I'm not inclined to.
Isn't there a way to get a more detailed explanation as to what "vulnerabilities" were discovered? If the means to get further info isn't available, than this can serve as a request to further elaborate via the BIS interface.
Thanks for any info.
