Phishing protection of Bitdefender Free and Traffic Light.
Why with Bitdefender Free, to have more complete protection against phishing, is it necessary to use Traffic Light as well, even if Bitdefender Free has protection against phishing?
Wouldn't it be better to update it and make it the same as Traffic Ligth?
Watch this test to the end:
Bitdefender Plus, Windows 10 Pro-32 Bit, CPU Intel Core2 Duo T7500, RAM 4 Gb, ATI Mobile Radeon HD 2400
Yes its much better protection with Trafficlight , but if they don't integrate it in BD free you can use the extension in your browser.1
See for yourself , bad protection in BD free (web phishing)
(52) League of Antivirus - Bitdefender Antivirus Free Edition 188.8.131.52 vs Phishing URLs, Test - YouTube
On fourth place BitD
(52) League of Antivirus - Scoreboard for FREE Antivirus - YouTube0
Yes, I know these tests which I am following carefully.
BD Free disappointed me ... I thought it was the best at least in phishing ... I have been using Avast for a while and I also noticed that the phishing detection is optimal and compared to BD Free it also recognizes more malware files.
Bitdefender Plus, Windows 10 Pro-32 Bit, CPU Intel Core2 Duo T7500, RAM 4 Gb, ATI Mobile Radeon HD 24001
Me too using avast for a week , Bitdefender have to improve their AV and integrate webprotection from trafficlight in BD free like the paid solutions have webprotection which is much better...
now all other free alternatives or far much better than BD free !0