Not Looking Good

PawBear

This might be unpopular but now owning 2 year subscription to Bitdefender Suite 10 I am disappointed to find this online. I present it hoping this will spur further program improvement:

http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-p...rewalls-ratings

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2036471,00.asp

http://reviews.cnet.com/internet-security-...7-32136371.html

Please join me in requesting program improvements.

Thanks.

vladx

Hi PawBear

You shouldn't be believe everything in magazines reviews, mostly aren't too reliable but the one from matousec it is.All depends if you consider leaktests important, personally i don't.If they could add antileak protection it would be nice, but there are other things more important to add or improve.

bluesprite

Indeed, antileak protection is often too intrusive; you have to give your explicit consent every time a program interacts with another one, like opening a file or launching another program. I'd rather have the antivirus detect the hypothetical trojan before it got the chance to penetrate the firewall.

vladx

Well assuming a smart rootkit is in your computer and plants malware that uses these leaks, then antileak protection would be needed in this case.

PawBear

Well assuming a smart rootkit is in your computer and plants malware that uses these leaks, then antileak protection would be needed in this case.

Thanks, folks. I mean no disrespect. It was on the strength of the virus protection I purchased, which from all reviews appears excellent. I want to promote the program to others but would like to feel more secure. Spam control needs improving. I get alot; 3/4 is caught but would like to see more.