Now,seriously, Why Bd Performs So Low

Comments

  • Hmm, maybe because you are a bit on the "low IQ" side?

  • Hmm, maybe because you are a bit on the "low IQ" side?


    OK, can you explain what that is supposed to mean? I detail please, don’t forget that I am on the “low IQ” side <img class=" />

  • alexcrist
    alexcrist
    edited April 2008

    I also want to hear the explanation of the above reaction. <_<

  • rudarel
    edited April 2008

    Because you didn't see, they used 33 samples of polimorphic viruses, 33 out of the tens of thousands of poly viruses, or milions and milions of malware. it missed half, so obviously that means bitdefender has only a 50% detection rate. i can easily find 33 samples that avira can't detect and use those, chances are that bitdefender will score some of then... then avira ###### and bitdefender rocks?


    You shouldn't be hyped into beliving all these testing reports. also, i've seen your behaviour, you are are a troll screaming about this and that.

  • Actually, only 11 polymorphic families have been used in the test.


    33 was the maximum number of points which could have been achieved.


    Anyhow, any burst like the above one will lead to a Warning increase.

  • Most of the tests were on the older versions of Bitdefender lol