Intrusion Detection System Feedback
BitDefender2015 intrusion detection system is not valid on 64-bit systems, I tested 100 samples of the virus double-click (closed AVC) and IDS no response, this problem has existed for a long time not being used to solve around BitDefender users complain about being from IDS The 64 systems have yet to see this work is a very serious problem, I hope to attract your attention. Any 64-bit and 32-bit systems, intrusion detection systems, at least the difference between the 100, at least there will be double-click on the virus to intercept, would like to draw your attention, after all, the customer experience is the effective protection of your product, rather than repeatedly shirk and excuses. I am very familiar with the product features, you have been able to determine the BitDefender Intrusion Detection System 64 system failure in question is true, I hope you, thank you.
In 32-bit systems, intrusion detection systems BitDefender large number of samples can intercept threats, currently 64 systems have become mainstream systems, 32 systems have been eliminated, so I hope the official importance, AV-Comparatives test of real-world use of the system is 64, at 64 BitDefender intrusion detection system failure, just a decoration, do not block any malicious software. This row of 32 technical and 64 hook hook system technology system is not the same factor, because even if different, in the case of near 100 AVC Double-click the virus in some way to intercept, the results did not intercept the samples. And many 32-bit systems to intercept viruses AVC AVC same system 64 interceptions. However, some special AVC does not block virus, intrusion detection systems can intercept, but the current situation is that the system does not work for IDS 64, which for many users in the system 64 is not fair. Suggest that you will AVC and IDS functional integration, I know you have the use of virtualization technology AVC, then IDS also want to make use of AVC technology, so you can get rid of 64 system of restrictions on the HOOK. Otherwise you will always be a decoration at IDS 64 system, it might as well delete this component. So I suggest that IDS technology into AVC inside, which is achieved through.
Maybe you need to re-design the intrusion detection system-driven architecture, allowing IDS supports 64-bit systems. Anyway, I hope that the official can help users solve this problem, before many users are not reflected in the clear solution, officials hope to consider the user experience, thank you.
Comments
-
Same problem...I have Win 7 (64 bit) installed and try to install the keylogging programm - Bitdefender did nothing to protect from it...This broblem is very old (about 2 years) and still nothing has been done to solve it!BitDefender2015 intrusion detection system is not valid on 64-bit systems, I tested 100 samples of the virus double-click (closed AVC) and IDS no response, this problem has existed for a long time not being used to solve around BitDefender users complain about being from IDS The 64 systems have yet to see this work is a very serious problem, I hope to attract your attention. Any 64-bit and 32-bit systems, intrusion detection systems, at least the difference between the 100, at least there will be double-click on the virus to intercept, would like to draw your attention, after all, the customer experience is the effective protection of your product, rather than repeatedly shirk and excuses. I am very familiar with the product features, you have been able to determine the BitDefender Intrusion Detection System 64 system failure in question is true, I hope you, thank you.
In 32-bit systems, intrusion detection systems BitDefender large number of samples can intercept threats, currently 64 systems have become mainstream systems, 32 systems have been eliminated, so I hope the official importance, AV-Comparatives test of real-world use of the system is 64, at 64 BitDefender intrusion detection system failure, just a decoration, do not block any malicious software. This row of 32 technical and 64 hook hook system technology system is not the same factor, because even if different, in the case of near 100 AVC Double-click the virus in some way to intercept, the results did not intercept the samples. And many 32-bit systems to intercept viruses AVC AVC same system 64 interceptions. However, some special AVC does not block virus, intrusion detection systems can intercept, but the current situation is that the system does not work for IDS 64, which for many users in the system 64 is not fair. Suggest that you will AVC and IDS functional integration, I know you have the use of virtualization technology AVC, then IDS also want to make use of AVC technology, so you can get rid of 64 system of restrictions on the HOOK. Otherwise you will always be a decoration at IDS 64 system, it might as well delete this component. So I suggest that IDS technology into AVC inside, which is achieved through.
Maybe you need to re-design the intrusion detection system-driven architecture, allowing IDS supports 64-bit systems. Anyway, I hope that the official can help users solve this problem, before many users are not reflected in the clear solution, officials hope to consider the user experience, thank you.
" /> 0 -
I agree! Dear BitDefender, why are you ignoring your customers??
0
