Compensation For False-positive Of Trojan.fakealert.5?
In this Thread, it's all about appropriate compensation from issue of 20 March 2010![/font][/size]
if you have a question to the issue, please post it on http://forum.bitdefender.com/index.php?showtopic=18759 !
Please let this not out of your frustration, but remains factually....
I think that BitDefender had to compensate all consumers who bought their product for another year free use of their current license key. In the past, some other reputable manufacture of antimalware was affected by false-positive. Many manufacture has make credits or cache-back offers to get losted trust again.
What do you see as reasonable compensation?